Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 1
How do the Beneteau 323 and Beneteau Figaro 1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 323 
Beneteau Figaro 1 | Beneteau 323 | Beneteau Figaro 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.01 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 10.7 ft3.25 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 9,325 lb4,230 kg | 5,291 lb2,400 kg |
| Ballast | 2,414 lb1,095 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 542 ft²50.4 m² | 512 ft²47.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 26.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 113 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.1 | 12.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.0 |
Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 1: the short version
- The Beneteau 323 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.01 m LOA versus 30.0 ft9.14 m for the Beneteau Figaro 1.
- The Beneteau 323 is heavier, displacing about 76% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 1 carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 323 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 323 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.