Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau 323 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 323 
Beneteau Figaro 3 | Beneteau 323 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.01 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 9,325 lb4,230 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,414 lb1,095 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 542 ft²50.4 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.1 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.5 |
Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.01 m for the Beneteau 323.
- The Beneteau 323 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 323 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 323 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.