Beneteau 331 vs Beneteau Figaro 2
How do the Beneteau 331 and Beneteau Figaro 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 331 
Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau 331 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.9 ft10.34 m | 33.3 ft10.15 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.30 m | 32.1 ft9.80 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.45 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 11,173 lb5,068 kg | 6,680 lb3,030 kg |
| Ballast | 3,253 lb1,476 kg | 2,447 lb1,110 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 792 ft²73.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.01 | 35.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.6 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.6 |
Beneteau 331 vs Beneteau Figaro 2: the short version
- The Beneteau 331 is the larger boat at 33.9 ft10.34 m LOA versus 33.3 ft10.15 m for the Beneteau Figaro 2.
- The Beneteau 331 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 331 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 331 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.