Beneteau 331 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau 331 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 331 
Beneteau Figaro 3 | Beneteau 331 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.9 ft10.34 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.30 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.45 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 11,173 lb5,068 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 3,253 lb1,476 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.01 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.6 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.5 |
Beneteau 331 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 33.9 ft10.34 m for the Beneteau 331.
- The Beneteau 331 is heavier, displacing about 75% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 331 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 331 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.