Beneteau 331 vs Creekmore 34
How do the Beneteau 331 and Creekmore 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 331 
Creekmore 34 | Beneteau 331 | Creekmore 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.9 ft10.34 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.30 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.45 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.9 ft1.49 m |
| Displacement | 11,173 lb5,068 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 3,253 lb1,476 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 589 ft²54.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.01 | 14.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 296 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.6 | 32.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.3 |
Beneteau 331 vs Creekmore 34: the short version
- The Beneteau 331 and Creekmore 34 are close in length (33.9 ft10.34 m vs 34.0 ft10.36 m ).
- The Creekmore 34 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau 331 carries the more powerful rig (16.0 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Creekmore 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Creekmore 34 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.