Beneteau 361 vs Beneteau Figaro 2
How do the Beneteau 361 and Beneteau Figaro 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 361 
Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau 361 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.10 m | 33.3 ft10.15 m |
| Waterline length | 31.1 ft9.47 m | 32.1 ft9.80 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 13,349 lb6,055 kg | 6,680 lb3,030 kg |
| Ballast | 4,156 lb1,885 kg | 2,447 lb1,110 kg |
| Sail area | 592 ft²55.0 m² | 792 ft²73.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 35.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.8 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Beneteau 361 vs Beneteau Figaro 2: the short version
- The Beneteau 361 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.10 m LOA versus 33.3 ft10.15 m for the Beneteau Figaro 2.
- The Beneteau 361 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 361 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 361 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.