Beneteau Figaro 1 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau Figaro 1 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Beneteau Figaro 1 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 27.6 ft8.40 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 10.7 ft3.25 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 5,291 lb2,400 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 512 ft²47.6 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.98 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 113 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Beneteau Figaro 1 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 30.0 ft9.14 m for the Beneteau Figaro 1.
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 27.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau Figaro 1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau Figaro 1 rates better for offshore work (2.45 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Beneteau Figaro 1
Beneteau Figaro 3