Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau Figaro 2 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 2 
Beneteau Figaro 3 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.80 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.15 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 6,680 lb3,030 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,447 lb1,110 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 792 ft²73.6 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.73 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.39 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.5 |
Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 33.3 ft10.15 m for the Beneteau Figaro 2.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 35.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau Figaro 2 rates better for offshore work (2.39 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.