Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau First 265
How do the Beneteau Figaro 2 and Beneteau First 265 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 2 
Beneteau First 265 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau First 265 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.80 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 9.4 ft2.87 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.15 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 6,680 lb3,030 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 2,447 lb1,110 kg | 1,430 lb649 kg |
| Sail area | 792 ft²73.6 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.73 | 18.16 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 152 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 15.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.39 | 2.23 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 6.6 |
Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau First 265: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is the larger boat at 33.3 ft10.15 m LOA versus 26.0 ft7.92 m for the Beneteau First 265.
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau First 265 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau First 265 rates better for offshore work (2.23 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.