Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Oceanis 281
How do the Beneteau Figaro 2 and Beneteau Oceanis 281 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 2 
Beneteau Oceanis 281 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau Oceanis 281 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 28.5 ft8.69 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.80 m | 24.5 ft7.47 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 9.4 ft2.87 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.15 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 6,680 lb3,030 kg | 5,732 lb2,600 kg |
| Ballast | 2,447 lb1,110 kg | 1,676 lb760 kg |
| Sail area | 792 ft²73.6 m² | 335 ft²31.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.73 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 17.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.39 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 6.6 |
Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Oceanis 281: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is the larger boat at 33.3 ft10.15 m LOA versus 28.5 ft8.69 m for the Beneteau Oceanis 281.
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau Oceanis 281 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau Oceanis 281 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.