Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Oceanis 321
How do the Beneteau Figaro 2 and Beneteau Oceanis 321 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 2 
Beneteau Oceanis 321 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau Oceanis 321 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 32.6 ft9.95 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.80 m | 29.4 ft8.95 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 11.2 ft3.42 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.15 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 6,680 lb3,030 kg | 9,700 lb4,400 kg |
| Ballast | 2,447 lb1,110 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 792 ft²73.6 m² | 500 ft²46.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 35.73 | 17.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 171 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.39 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.3 |
Beneteau Figaro 2 vs Beneteau Oceanis 321: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is the larger boat at 33.3 ft10.15 m LOA versus 32.6 ft9.95 m for the Beneteau Oceanis 321.
- The Beneteau Oceanis 321 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau Oceanis 321 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau Oceanis 321 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.