Beneteau Figaro 3 vs Frigate 36
How do the Beneteau Figaro 3 and Frigate 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 3 
Frigate 36 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | Frigate 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.89 m | 35.7 ft10.87 m |
| Waterline length | 31.0 ft9.46 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Beam | 11.4 ft3.48 m | 10.2 ft3.11 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.2 ft2.18 m |
| Displacement | 6,393 lb2,900 kg | 11,575 lb5,250 kg |
| Ballast | 2,449 lb1,111 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Sail area | 753 ft²70.0 m² | 511 ft²47.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.98 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 95 | 355 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.9 | 29.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 6.6 |
Beneteau Figaro 3 vs Frigate 36: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 and Frigate 36 are close in length (35.7 ft10.89 m vs 35.7 ft10.87 m ).
- The Frigate 36 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Frigate 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Frigate 36 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.