Beneteau Figaro 3 vs Pilot 35
How do the Beneteau Figaro 3 and Pilot 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau Figaro 3 
Pilot 35 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | Pilot 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.89 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 31.0 ft9.46 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 11.4 ft3.48 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 6,393 lb2,900 kg | 13,700 lb6,214 kg |
| Ballast | 2,449 lb1,111 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 753 ft²70.0 m² | 550 ft²51.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.98 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 95 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.9 | 37.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 6.7 |
Beneteau Figaro 3 vs Pilot 35: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 and Pilot 35 are close in length (35.7 ft10.89 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- The Pilot 35 is heavier, displacing about 114% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pilot 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pilot 35 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.