Beneteau First 265 vs Hallberg-Rassy 26
How do the Beneteau First 265 and Hallberg-Rassy 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau First 265 | Beneteau First 265 | Hallberg-Rassy 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.1 ft7.95 m |
| Waterline length | 24.2 ft7.37 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 8.8 ft2.68 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 5,512 lb2,500 kg |
| Ballast | 1,430 lb649 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 398 ft²37.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.16 | 20.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 152 | 279 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.1 | 21.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.23 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | — | €10,000 |
Beneteau First 265 vs Hallberg-Rassy 26: the short version
- The Beneteau First 265 and Hallberg-Rassy 26 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.1 ft7.95 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hallberg-Rassy 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hallberg-Rassy 26 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.