Bermuda 40 vs Caliber 40
How do the Bermuda 40 and Caliber 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bermuda 40 | Bermuda 40 | Caliber 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.42 m | 40.9 ft12.47 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.48 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.7 ft3.86 m |
| Draft | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 21,600 lb9,798 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Sail area | 648 ft²60.2 m² | 739 ft²68.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.56 | 15.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 394 | 281 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 32.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.6 |
Bermuda 40 vs Caliber 40: the short version
- The Bermuda 40 and Caliber 40 are close in length (40.8 ft12.42 m vs 40.9 ft12.47 m ).
- The Caliber 40 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Caliber 40 carries the more powerful rig (15.2 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bermuda 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bermuda 40 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.82).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.