Bermuda 40 vs Hallberg-Rassy 40
How do the Bermuda 40 and Hallberg-Rassy 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bermuda 40 | Bermuda 40 | Hallberg-Rassy 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.42 m | 40.7 ft12.40 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.48 m | 36.2 ft11.04 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.5 ft3.82 m |
| Draft | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 6.5 ft1.99 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 22,100 lb10,024 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 648 ft²60.2 m² | 869 ft²80.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.56 | 17.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 394 | 207 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 31.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 8.1 |
Bermuda 40 vs Hallberg-Rassy 40: the short version
- The Bermuda 40 and Hallberg-Rassy 40 are close in length (40.8 ft12.42 m vs 40.7 ft12.40 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 40 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hallberg-Rassy 40 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bermuda 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bermuda 40 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.