Bermuda 40 vs Lord Nelson 41
How do the Bermuda 40 and Lord Nelson 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bermuda 40 | Bermuda 40 | Lord Nelson 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.42 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.48 m | 36.2 ft11.03 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 30,500 lb13,835 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Sail area | 648 ft²60.2 m² | 1,046 ft²97.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.56 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 394 | 287 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 41.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 8.1 |
Bermuda 40 vs Lord Nelson 41: the short version
- The Bermuda 40 and Lord Nelson 41 are close in length (40.8 ft12.42 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Lord Nelson 41 is heavier, displacing about 61% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Lord Nelson 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Lord Nelson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Lord Nelson 41 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.