Bianca 26/28 vs C&C SR 27
How do the Bianca 26/28 and C&C SR 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bianca 26/28 | Bianca 26/28 | C&C SR 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.6 ft8.40 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.60 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.2 ft1.59 m |
| Displacement | 5,071 lb2,300 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 431 ft²40.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 23.36 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 283 | 121 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.2 | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €6,100 | — |
Bianca 26/28 vs C&C SR 27: the short version
- The Bianca 26/28 and C&C SR 27 are close in length (27.6 ft8.40 m vs 27.5 ft8.38 m ).
- The Bianca 26/28 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Bianca 26/28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bianca 26/28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.