Bic 210 vs Funny
How do the Bic 210 and Funny compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 210 | Bic 210 | Funny | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.61 | 2.56 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bic 210 vs Funny: the short version
- The Bic 210 and Funny are close in length (11.5 ft3.50 m vs 11.7 ft3.55 m ).
- The Bic 210 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Funny rates better for offshore work (2.56 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.