Bic 210 vs Interclub Dinghy
How do the Bic 210 and Interclub Dinghy compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 210 | Bic 210 | Interclub Dinghy | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 150 lb68 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 72 ft²6.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 40.81 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 44 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.61 | 3.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.5 |
Bic 210 vs Interclub Dinghy: the short version
- The Bic 210 and Interclub Dinghy are close in length (11.5 ft3.50 m vs 11.5 ft3.51 m ).
- The Interclub Dinghy is heavier, displacing about 275% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bic 210 rates better for offshore work (2.61 vs 3.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.