Bic 210 vs Kite
How do the Bic 210 and Kite compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 210 | Bic 210 | Kite | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 165 lb75 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 78 ft²7.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 41.49 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 57 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.61 | 3.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.4 |
Bic 210 vs Kite: the short version
- The Bic 210 and Kite are close in length (11.5 ft3.50 m vs 11.6 ft3.53 m ).
- The Kite is heavier, displacing about 313% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bic 210 rates better for offshore work (2.61 vs 3.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.