Bic 210 vs Merak Fun
How do the Bic 210 and Merak Fun compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 210 | Bic 210 | Merak Fun | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 39 lb18 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.61 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bic 210 vs Merak Fun: the short version
- The Bic 210 and Merak Fun are close in length (11.5 ft3.50 m vs 11.5 ft3.50 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the Merak Fun rates better for offshore work (2.51 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.