Bic 250 vs Bombardier 3.8
How do the Bic 250 and Bombardier 3.8 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 250 | Bic 250 | Bombardier 3.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.5 ft3.80 m | 12.5 ft3.80 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.65 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Draft | —— | 2.6 ft0.79 m |
| Displacement | 42 lb19 kg | 110 lb50 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 59 ft²5.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 41.12 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 3.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bic 250 vs Bombardier 3.8: the short version
- The Bic 250 and Bombardier 3.8 are close in length (12.5 ft3.80 m vs 12.5 ft3.80 m ).
- The Bombardier 3.8 is heavier, displacing about 162% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bic 250 rates better for offshore work (2.45 vs 3.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.