Bic 250 vs Fun 380
How do the Bic 250 and Fun 380 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bic 250 | Bic 250 | Fun 380 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.5 ft3.80 m | 12.5 ft3.80 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.65 m | 2.2 ft0.68 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 42 lb19 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bic 250 vs Fun 380: the short version
- The Bic 250 and Fun 380 are close in length (12.5 ft3.80 m vs 12.5 ft3.80 m ).
- The Bic 250 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bic 250 rates better for offshore work (2.45 vs 2.68).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.