Birdie 24 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24
How do the Birdie 24 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Birdie 24 | Birdie 24 | Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.1 ft7.36 m | 24.1 ft7.35 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 19.9 ft6.05 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 4,079 lb1,850 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.66 | 18.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 219 | 233 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 20.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | €2,970 |
Birdie 24 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24: the short version
- The Birdie 24 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 are close in length (24.1 ft7.36 m vs 24.1 ft7.35 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Birdie 24 carries the more powerful rig (22.7 vs 18.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.