Blazer 23 vs Ontario 32
How do the Blazer 23 and Ontario 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blazer 23 
Ontario 32 | Blazer 23 | Ontario 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 9,800 lb4,445 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 3,977 lb1,804 kg |
| Sail area | 260 ft²24.2 m² | 481 ft²44.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.59 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 22.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.9 |
Blazer 23 vs Ontario 32: the short version
- The Ontario 32 is the larger boat at 32.0 ft9.75 m LOA versus 23.0 ft7.01 m for the Blazer 23.
- The Ontario 32 is heavier, displacing about 345% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Blazer 23 carries the more powerful rig (24.6 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ontario 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ontario 32 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.