Blazer 23 vs Viking 33
How do the Blazer 23 and Viking 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blazer 23 
Viking 33 | Blazer 23 | Viking 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 33.6 ft10.24 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 8,807 lb3,995 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 4,512 lb2,047 kg |
| Sail area | 260 ft²24.2 m² | 519 ft²48.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.59 | 19.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 196 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 7.0 |
Blazer 23 vs Viking 33: the short version
- The Viking 33 is the larger boat at 33.6 ft10.24 m LOA versus 23.0 ft7.01 m for the Blazer 23.
- The Viking 33 is heavier, displacing about 300% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Blazer 23 carries the more powerful rig (24.6 vs 19.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Viking 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Viking 33 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.