Blue Up vs Chico
How do the Blue Up and Chico compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blue Up | Blue Up | Chico | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 176 lb80 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 62 ft²5.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 31.59 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 4.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Blue Up vs Chico: the short version
- The Blue Up and Chico are close in length (11.8 ft3.60 m vs 11.8 ft3.60 m ).
- The Chico is heavier, displacing about 329% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Blue Up rates better for offshore work (2.62 vs 4.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.