Blue Up vs Magnum Fun 350
How do the Blue Up and Magnum Fun 350 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blue Up | Blue Up | Magnum Fun 350 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Blue Up vs Magnum Fun 350: the short version
- The Blue Up and Magnum Fun 350 are close in length (11.8 ft3.60 m vs 11.7 ft3.55 m ).
- The Blue Up is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnum Fun 350 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.