Blue Water 24 vs C&C 24
How do the Blue Water 24 and C&C 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blue Water 24 
C&C 24 | Blue Water 24 | C&C 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,950 lb3,606 kg | 3,200 lb1,451 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,050 lb476 kg |
| Sail area | 276 ft²25.6 m² | 252 ft²23.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 11.09 | 18.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 466 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.4 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Blue Water 24 vs C&C 24: the short version
- The Blue Water 24 and C&C 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Blue Water 24 is heavier, displacing about 148% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 11.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Blue Water 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Blue Water 24 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.