Blue Water 24 vs International 110
How do the Blue Water 24 and International 110 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blue Water 24 Blue Water Boats/Holden Laminates · 1961 
International 110 Cape Cod Shipbuilding · 1939 | Blue Water 24 | International 110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 7,950 lb3,606 kg | 910 lb413 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 300 lb136 kg |
| Sail area | 276 ft²25.6 m² | 157 ft²14.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 11.09 | 26.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 466 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.4 | 10.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.7 |
Blue Water 24 vs International 110: the short version
- The Blue Water 24 and International 110 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Blue Water 24 is heavier, displacing about 774% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 110 carries the more powerful rig (26.8 vs 11.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Blue Water 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Blue Water 24 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.