Bluejacket 23 vs Chance 32/28
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Chance 32/28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Chance 32/28 | Bluejacket 23 | Chance 32/28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 32.1 ft9.78 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 5.8 ft1.75 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 12,025 lb5,454 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 4,680 lb2,123 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 13.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 29.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 7.1 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Chance 32/28: the short version
- The Chance 32/28 is the larger boat at 32.1 ft9.78 m LOA versus 22.8 ft6.96 m for the Bluejacket 23.
- The Chance 32/28 is heavier, displacing about 501% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bluejacket 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Chance 32/28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Chance 32/28 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.