Bluejacket 23 vs Northwind 29
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Northwind 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Northwind 29 | Bluejacket 23 | Northwind 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 28.8 ft8.78 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 3,180 lb1,442 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 374 ft²34.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 17.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.3 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Northwind 29: the short version
- The Northwind 29 is the larger boat at 28.8 ft8.78 m LOA versus 22.8 ft6.96 m for the Bluejacket 23.
- The Northwind 29 is heavier, displacing about 230% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bluejacket 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northwind 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Northwind 29 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.