Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship 20
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Paceship 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Paceship 20 | Bluejacket 23 | Paceship 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 17.2 ft5.24 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 800 lb363 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 28.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 4.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 3.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship 20: the short version
- The Bluejacket 23 is the larger boat at 22.8 ft6.96 m LOA versus 19.3 ft5.87 m for the Paceship 20.
- The Bluejacket 23 is heavier, displacing about 150% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluejacket 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluejacket 23 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.