Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship PY 26
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Paceship PY 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Paceship PY 26 | Bluejacket 23 | Paceship PY 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 26.3 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 339 ft²31.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 16.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.4 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship PY 26: the short version
- The Paceship PY 26 is the larger boat at 26.3 ft8.03 m LOA versus 22.8 ft6.96 m for the Bluejacket 23.
- The Paceship PY 26 is heavier, displacing about 200% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bluejacket 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Paceship PY 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Paceship PY 26 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.