Bluejacket MS 23 vs Challenger 24
How do the Bluejacket MS 23 and Challenger 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket MS 23 
Challenger 24 | Bluejacket MS 23 | Challenger 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 24.3 ft7.42 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.32 m | 22.2 ft6.76 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 2,090 lb948 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 253 ft²23.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 10.42 | 16.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 16.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.3 |
Bluejacket MS 23 vs Challenger 24: the short version
- The Bluejacket MS 23 and Challenger 24 are close in length (24.3 ft7.39 m vs 24.3 ft7.42 m ).
- The Bluejacket MS 23 is heavier, displacing about 50% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Challenger 24 carries the more powerful rig (16.1 vs 10.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluejacket MS 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Challenger 24 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.