Bluejacket MS 23 vs Etap 23
How do the Bluejacket MS 23 and Etap 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket MS 23 | Bluejacket MS 23 | Etap 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 24.2 ft7.38 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.32 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 3,320 lb1,506 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 1,036 lb470 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 190 ft²17.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 10.42 | 13.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 216 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 15.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 5.8 |
Bluejacket MS 23 vs Etap 23: the short version
- The Bluejacket MS 23 and Etap 23 are close in length (24.3 ft7.39 m vs 24.2 ft7.38 m ).
- The Bluejacket MS 23 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 23 carries the more powerful rig (13.7 vs 10.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluejacket MS 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 23 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.