Bluejacket MS 23 vs Halman Horizon
How do the Bluejacket MS 23 and Halman Horizon compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket MS 23 
Halman Horizon | Bluejacket MS 23 | Halman Horizon | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.32 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 10.42 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.4 |
Bluejacket MS 23 vs Halman Horizon: the short version
- The Halman Horizon is the larger boat at 27.0 ft8.23 m LOA versus 24.3 ft7.39 m for the Bluejacket MS 23.
- The Halman Horizon is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Halman Horizon scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Halman Horizon rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.