Bluenose one-design sloop vs Fun 23
How do the Bluenose one-design sloop and Fun 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluenose one-design sloop 
Fun 23 | Bluenose one-design sloop | Fun 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.4 ft7.14 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 17.9 ft5.46 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 2,050 lb930 kg | 1,875 lb850 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 760 lb345 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 243 ft²22.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.61 | 25.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 145 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.1 | 9.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 2.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.7 |
Bluenose one-design sloop vs Fun 23: the short version
- The Bluenose one-design sloop and Fun 23 are close in length (23.4 ft7.14 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Bluenose one-design sloop is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fun 23 carries the more powerful rig (25.6 vs 21.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluenose one-design sloop scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluenose one-design sloop rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.