Bluenose one-design sloop vs Schock 23
How do the Bluenose one-design sloop and Schock 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluenose one-design sloop 
Schock 23 | Bluenose one-design sloop | Schock 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.4 ft7.14 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 2,050 lb930 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.61 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 142 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.1 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 2.41 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Bluenose one-design sloop vs Schock 23: the short version
- The Bluenose one-design sloop and Schock 23 are close in length (23.4 ft7.14 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Schock 23 is heavier, displacing about 37% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bluenose one-design sloop carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluenose one-design sloop scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluenose one-design sloop rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.