Bombardier 3.8 vs Swing
How do the Bombardier 3.8 and Swing compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bombardier 3.8 | Bombardier 3.8 | Swing | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.5 ft3.80 m | 12.4 ft3.78 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 2.2 ft0.68 m |
| Draft | 2.6 ft0.79 m | —— |
| Displacement | 110 lb50 kg | 40 lb18 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 59 ft²5.5 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 41.12 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.70 | 2.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bombardier 3.8 vs Swing: the short version
- The Bombardier 3.8 and Swing are close in length (12.5 ft3.80 m vs 12.4 ft3.78 m ).
- The Bombardier 3.8 is heavier, displacing about 175% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swing rates better for offshore work (2.61 vs 3.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.