Bombardier 4.8 vs Bombardier 7.6
How do the Bombardier 4.8 and Bombardier 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bombardier 4.8 
Bombardier 7.6 | Bombardier 4.8 | Bombardier 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.8 ft4.82 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 300 lb136 kg | 3,300 lb1,497 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 985 lb447 kg |
| Sail area | 128 ft²11.9 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 45.70 | 21.58 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.99 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.4 |
Bombardier 4.8 vs Bombardier 7.6: the short version
- The Bombardier 7.6 is the larger boat at 25.3 ft7.72 m LOA versus 15.8 ft4.82 m for the Bombardier 4.8.
- The Bombardier 7.6 is heavier, displacing about 1000% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bombardier 4.8 carries the more powerful rig (45.7 vs 21.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bombardier 7.6 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.