Bombardier 4.8 vs Phantom 16
How do the Bombardier 4.8 and Phantom 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bombardier 4.8 | Bombardier 4.8 | Phantom 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.8 ft4.82 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 300 lb136 kg | 265 lb120 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 128 ft²11.9 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 45.70 | 116.73 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.99 | 4.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Bombardier 4.8 vs Phantom 16: the short version
- The Bombardier 4.8 and Phantom 16 are close in length (15.8 ft4.82 m vs 15.9 ft4.85 m ).
- The Bombardier 4.8 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 16 carries the more powerful rig (116.7 vs 45.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bombardier 4.8 rates better for offshore work (2.99 vs 4.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.