Bombardier 7.6 vs Cal 2-25
How do the Bombardier 7.6 and Cal 2-25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bombardier 7.6 
Cal 2-25 | Bombardier 7.6 | Cal 2-25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.72 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 985 lb447 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.58 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 129 | 189 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 16.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Bombardier 7.6 vs Cal 2-25: the short version
- The Bombardier 7.6 and Cal 2-25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.72 m vs 25.3 ft7.70 m ).
- The Cal 2-25 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bombardier 7.6 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 2-25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 2-25 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.