Bremer 25 vs Kelt 7.6
How do the Bremer 25 and Kelt 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bremer 25 
Kelt 7.6 | Bremer 25 | Kelt 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.4 ft2.88 m |
| Draft | 6.2 ft1.88 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 3,800 lb1,724 kg | 4,188 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,600 lb726 kg | 1,631 lb740 kg |
| Sail area | 310 ft²28.8 m² | 273 ft²25.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.37 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.8 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.1 |
Bremer 25 vs Kelt 7.6: the short version
- The Bremer 25 and Kelt 7.6 are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Kelt 7.6 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bremer 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bremer 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bremer 25 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.