Bridges Point 24 vs Captiva 240
How do the Bridges Point 24 and Captiva 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bridges Point 24 | Bridges Point 24 | Captiva 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 3,944 lb1,789 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 278 ft²25.8 m² | 280 ft²26.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.82 | 24.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 271 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Bridges Point 24 vs Captiva 240: the short version
- The Bridges Point 24 and Captiva 240 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Bridges Point 24 is heavier, displacing about 64% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Captiva 240 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bridges Point 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bridges Point 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.