Bridges Point 24 vs C&C 24
How do the Bridges Point 24 and C&C 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bridges Point 24 
C&C 24 | Bridges Point 24 | C&C 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 3,944 lb1,789 kg | 3,200 lb1,451 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 1,050 lb476 kg |
| Sail area | 278 ft²25.8 m² | 252 ft²23.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.82 | 18.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 271 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Bridges Point 24 vs C&C 24: the short version
- The Bridges Point 24 and C&C 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Bridges Point 24 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bridges Point 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bridges Point 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.