Bridges Point 24 vs Islander 24
How do the Bridges Point 24 and Islander 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bridges Point 24 | Bridges Point 24 | Islander 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 3,944 lb1,789 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 278 ft²25.8 m² | 269 ft²25.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.82 | 16.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 271 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 19.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Bridges Point 24 vs Islander 24: the short version
- The Bridges Point 24 and Islander 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Bridges Point 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bridges Point 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bridges Point 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.