Bridges Point 24 vs Melges 24
How do the Bridges Point 24 and Melges 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bridges Point 24 
Melges 24 | Bridges Point 24 | Melges 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,944 lb1,789 kg | 1,784 lb809 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 650 lb295 kg |
| Sail area | 278 ft²25.8 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.82 | 31.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 271 | 75 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.69 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Bridges Point 24 vs Melges 24: the short version
- The Bridges Point 24 and Melges 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Bridges Point 24 is heavier, displacing about 121% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Melges 24 carries the more powerful rig (31.7 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bridges Point 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bridges Point 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.69).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.