Bridges Point 24 vs Shark 24
How do the Bridges Point 24 and Shark 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bridges Point 24 
Shark 24 | Bridges Point 24 | Shark 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.31 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.69 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 3,944 lb1,789 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 675 lb306 kg |
| Sail area | 278 ft²25.8 m² | 190 ft²17.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.82 | 18.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 271 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 11.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,980 |
Bridges Point 24 vs Shark 24: the short version
- The Bridges Point 24 and Shark 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.31 m ).
- The Bridges Point 24 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Shark 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bridges Point 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bridges Point 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.